<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Coffee, Code and Chocolate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog</link>
	<description>throw new Exception(&#34;#fail&#34;);</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:30:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Dependency Injection for Test Driven Development by Ganesh Ranganathan</title>
		<link>http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/index.php/2010/01/dependency-injection-for-test-driven-development/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Ganesh Ranganathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/?p=831#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Hi Krupa,
A core idea of Test driven development is to have the developer write code for the unit test along with the functionality. So you write a  stub for the method and then the test case for it and see the test fail. then you code the functionality and make sure it passes. This makes each method of your application work as expected. However when you combine more than one Layer in this testing process, external dependencies are introduced and your code may fail because of the database not working as expected. Hence the suggestion to build loosely coupled layers that can be tested independently. The QA would anyway functionally test the entire application to make sure all layers work together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Krupa,<br />
A core idea of Test driven development is to have the developer write code for the unit test along with the functionality. So you write a  stub for the method and then the test case for it and see the test fail. then you code the functionality and make sure it passes. This makes each method of your application work as expected. However when you combine more than one Layer in this testing process, external dependencies are introduced and your code may fail because of the database not working as expected. Hence the suggestion to build loosely coupled layers that can be tested independently. The QA would anyway functionally test the entire application to make sure all layers work together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dependency Injection for Test Driven Development by Ganesh Ranganathan</title>
		<link>http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/index.php/2010/01/dependency-injection-for-test-driven-development/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Ganesh Ranganathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/?p=831#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing this out Krupa, I have changed the timing to India Time. I had never paid attention to this before. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing this out Krupa, I have changed the timing to India Time. I had never paid attention to this before. <img src='http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing a Google Chrome extension for displaying Twitter trending topics by Ganesh Ranganathan</title>
		<link>http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/writing-a-google-chrome-extension-for-displaying-twitter-trending-topics/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Ganesh Ranganathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/?p=922#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Done machi :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done machi <img src='http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing a Google Chrome extension for displaying Twitter trending topics by Ibrahim</title>
		<link>http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/index.php/2010/02/writing-a-google-chrome-extension-for-displaying-twitter-trending-topics/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Ibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/?p=922#comment-430</guid>
		<description>make the download link visible and distinct mate...:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>make the download link visible and distinct mate&#8230;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dependency Injection for Test Driven Development by S Krupa Shankar</title>
		<link>http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/index.php/2010/01/dependency-injection-for-test-driven-development/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>S Krupa Shankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/?p=831#comment-429</guid>
		<description>The timezone of this blog is configured to be US time? I wish I could wake up and post comments the same time in India... that will be a feast day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The timezone of this blog is configured to be US time? I wish I could wake up and post comments the same time in India&#8230; that will be a feast day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dependency Injection for Test Driven Development by S Krupa Shankar</title>
		<link>http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/index.php/2010/01/dependency-injection-for-test-driven-development/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>S Krupa Shankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/?p=831#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Hi Ganesh,

Really nice post.

However, I have a doubt. As shown in the example, the BusinessObjects and DataObjects classes will be tested individually. With this methodology, there is no test in place to check how the BL works combined with the DL. Or does this portion has more to do with manual testing?

Krupa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ganesh,</p>
<p>Really nice post.</p>
<p>However, I have a doubt. As shown in the example, the BusinessObjects and DataObjects classes will be tested individually. With this methodology, there is no test in place to check how the BL works combined with the DL. Or does this portion has more to do with manual testing?</p>
<p>Krupa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft Silverlight applications on GoDaddy by aloha</title>
		<link>http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/index.php/2009/11/microsoft-silverlight-applications-on-godaddy/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>aloha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/?p=316#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Very useful article. Thanks for sharing. I am going to open another windows base web site on godaddy which is using silverlight. This is a small tutorial for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful article. Thanks for sharing. I am going to open another windows base web site on godaddy which is using silverlight. This is a small tutorial for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deploying ASP.NET MVC Apps on Shared Hosting by Philip Dockerman</title>
		<link>http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/index.php/2010/01/deploying-asp-net-mvc-apps-on-shared-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Dockerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/?p=823#comment-241</guid>
		<description>May I suggest enhancing the article to cover getting your routes working from a default installation?  That is under IIS 6 you&#039;d have to setup wildcard mapping.  On a shared host I don&#039;t believe you can do this?

Just a thought ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I suggest enhancing the article to cover getting your routes working from a default installation?  That is under IIS 6 you&#8217;d have to setup wildcard mapping.  On a shared host I don&#8217;t believe you can do this?</p>
<p>Just a thought &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deploying ASP.NET MVC Apps on Shared Hosting by Ibrahim</title>
		<link>http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/index.php/2010/01/deploying-asp-net-mvc-apps-on-shared-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Ibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/?p=823#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Great info Ganesh. Thank you. We are planning to write develop our next application using ASP.NET MVC and we were considering the host options. Once again thanks for your info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info Ganesh. Thank you. We are planning to write develop our next application using ASP.NET MVC and we were considering the host options. Once again thanks for your info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deploying ASP.NET MVC Apps on Shared Hosting by S Krupa Shankar</title>
		<link>http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/index.php/2010/01/deploying-asp-net-mvc-apps-on-shared-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>S Krupa Shankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ganeshzone.net/blog/?p=823#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Another setting that did the trick for me was to change the ASP.NET version from 2.0 to 2.0 Integraed Pipeline. This can be done from Web Control Panel-&gt;Website-&gt;Extensions-&gt;ASP.NET version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another setting that did the trick for me was to change the ASP.NET version from 2.0 to 2.0 Integraed Pipeline. This can be done from Web Control Panel-&gt;Website-&gt;Extensions-&gt;ASP.NET version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
